11-02-2008, 18:30
|
#85 (permalink)
|
| ...a little crazy
Join Date: 21 Jul 2006 Location: Budapest, Hungary Age: 21
Posts: 709
| Re: Lunatism’s Statistical Selections (lss) Quote:
Originally Posted by palaceman I'm not dismissing the data, but the danger of sub-dividing into leagues like that is that within each division, the number of matches involved in your research is greatly reduced (naturally) so it might be dangerous to draw conclusions based on much more limited numbers.
Just by way of example, those leagues that are showing 100% success at certain scores, could you let us know what number of matches that is based on in each one? | you are 100% correct there palaceman, i thought so myself after posting those graphs - but i thought it would be the best way to show how each league is faring right now.....
the numbers are low (naturally, as you said), so what i propose is this - the overall stats are good, we know that - by delving deeper it can help identify leagues which aren't doing so well (as well as those that are), but to do this, i guess we'd need a sample size for each league too.........
what do you think would be sufficient? right now, the samples are WAY TOO small to draw any kind of conclusions (50/100/150 for each league?)
but ultimately, these individual league stats are a little irrelevent, as they ARE from smaller numbers of matches, and i don't believe I would EVER use this system to solely bet on one league.....just seems silly to me  biggest problem with the below tables is that it is trying to split 152 & 163 bets into around 31 leagues, on average only 4/6 selections per league. But these numbers should grow over the coming months anyhow
so here are the numbers: | 1 - 0 | | COUNTRY | STRIKE | wins | losses | | BLE01 | 20% | 1 | 4 | | ENG01 | 14% | 1 | 6 | | ENG02 | 17% | 2 | 10 | | ENG03 | 0% | 0 | 8 | | ENG04 | 38% | 3 | 5 | | ENG05 | 20% | 1 | 4 | | ENG06 | 0% | 0 | 4 | | ENG07 | 0% | 0 | 4 | | ENG08 | 33% | 1 | 2 | | ENG09 | 0% | 0 | 1 | | ENG10 | 0% | 0 | 4 | | FRA01 | 56% | 5 | 4 | | FRA02 | 57% | 4 | 3 | | FRA03 | 0% | 0 | 6 | | GER02 | 0% | 0 | 1 | | GRE01 | 64% | 7 | 4 | | ITA01 | 29% | 2 | 5 | | ITA02 | 33% | 2 | 4 | | NET1 | 0% | 0 | 3 | | NET2 | 0% | 0 | 5 | | POR01 | 25% | 1 | 3 | | POR02 | 50% | 1 | 1 | | SCO01 | 0% | 0 | 3 | | SCO02 | 0% | 0 | 1 | | SCO04 | 0% | 0 | 1 | | SPA01 | 25% | 2 | 6 | | SPA02 | 67% | 4 | 2 | | SWI01 | 0% | 0 | 2 | | TUR01 | 100% | 2 | 0 | | TUR02 | 0% | 0 | 1 | | WAL01 | 0% | 0 | 6 | | | | | | sub total | | 39 | 113 | | total | | 152 | | 1 - 1 | | COUNTRY | STRIKE RATE | wins | losses | | AUS01 | 100% | 1 | 0 | | BLE01 | 57% | 4 | 3 | | ENG01 | 18% | 2 | 9 | | ENG02 | 63% | 5 | 3 | | ENG03 | 100% | 11 | 0 | | ENG04 | 44% | 4 | 5 | | ENG05 | 33% | 1 | 2 | | ENG06 | 100% | 5 | 0 | | ENG07 | 75% | 3 | 1 | | ENG08 | 50% | 1 | 1 | | ENG09 | 80% | 4 | 1 | | ENG10 | 60% | 3 | 2 | | FRA01 | 11% | 1 | 8 | | FRA02 | 75% | 6 | 2 | | FRA03 | 0% | 0 | 2 | | GER01 | 100% | 4 | 0 | | GER02 | 50% | 2 | 2 | | GRE01 | 0% | 0 | 3 | | ITA01 | 40% | 2 | 3 | | ITA02 | 67% | 6 | 3 | | NET1 | 63% | 5 | 3 | | NET2 | 100% | 11 | 0 | | POR01 | 50% | 1 | 1 | | POR02 | 0% | 0 | 3 | | SCO01 | 100% | 2 | 0 | | SCO02 | 50% | 1 | 1 | | SPA01 | 57% | 4 | 3 | | SPA02 | 80% | 4 | 1 | | TUR01 | 50% | 1 | 1 | | TUR02 | 100% | 2 | 0 | | WAL01 | 100% | 4 | 0 | | | | | | sub total | | 100 | 63 | | total | | 163 | ...."perhaps" (???) it might be possible to suggest that the Netherlands 2nd and English League One are showing promise, but early days yet, and who knows for sure?!! i really appreciate the input from you all over this particular strand of my system BTW
__________________ lunatism [loo-na-ti-zam]: common sense, local lore & statisticus |
| |