The Punters Lounge - The World's Best Betting Forum - View Single Post - Champions League

MartinJB12 · 30-11-2007, 20:44

Sorry Paul but I feel the need to defend Nastro here. if you take a look at this DD guys previous history with regards to betting on Celtic games is to state that celtic will get hamerred and to bet strongly on whoever Celtic are playing. Now a main part of the pl rules state to give decent reasons behind your tips. This guy's only reasoning is simply to slate Celtic at every opportunity and use that as an excuse to back the other side. An extremely "childish" reason for backing a team in such a big fixture. DD's resentment towards Celtic most likely stem from his associatopn with Rangers and the unfortunate West of Scotland bigoted attitude he has towards his teams rivals. His views that Celtic would not have a hope in hell at home against shakhtar were indeed narrow minded and "childish". OK Nastro's comments were a bit strong, but the point he was making was more than justified. A threat of a ban is indeed harsh here in my opinion.

30-11-2007, 20:44	#112 (permalink)
MartinJB12 Banned Join Date: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 51	Re: Champions League - 28th November Sorry Paul but I feel the need to defend Nastro here. if you take a look at this DD guys previous history with regards to betting on Celtic games is to state that celtic will get hamerred and to bet strongly on whoever Celtic are playing. Now a main part of the pl rules state to give decent reasons behind your tips. This guy's only reasoning is simply to slate Celtic at every opportunity and use that as an excuse to back the other side. An extremely "childish" reason for backing a team in such a big fixture. DD's resentment towards Celtic most likely stem from his associatopn with Rangers and the unfortunate West of Scotland bigoted attitude he has towards his teams rivals. His views that Celtic would not have a hope in hell at home against shakhtar were indeed narrow minded and "childish". OK Nastro's comments were a bit strong, but the point he was making was more than justified. A threat of a ban is indeed harsh here in my opinion.