Quote:
Originally Posted by Football-Tipper  I would say they would be asked for evidence on what was said about putting up Golds seat |
OK, misunderstood what you were saying. When you talked about "counter
claims" I wondered for a minute if you thought Bodog were one of the parties
in the lawsuit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotaFancy? See what you say JarJar - but I wonder what our view would be if we heard Leyser's lawyers version of events.......
Unfortunately, lawyers dont seem capable of "balanced truth" ..... and can make the most ridiculous of claims sound plausible...... |
To be fair, though they should tell the truth, it's not their job to be
balanced. That's why both sides have a lawyer.
Yes, it's very hard to draw conclusions having seen only one side of the
case. But I agree with jarjaruk, there are enough claims in those documents
that could easily be proved false if they weren't true that I do think Leyser
sounds like a nasty piece of work. Which is not to say Gold shouldn't have
given him some money.
Sure, I might change my mind when I hear more, but enough people have
been judging Gold over the last few months while it was only Leyser's side
of the story that was being heard that I won't feel too guilty about letting
Gold have a turn.