Quite happy with the ten minute rule.
How about if we select a horse that isn't favourite (like mine) but we rate the favourite as the danger ? Would it be okay to put
F.I.A. (favourite if absent) without typing out the extra reasoning?
It's not often I go as in depth as BillyThePunter, who also gives his opinion of those that are fancied. So, in a similar scenario, what about if we name the horse that's considered to be the danger in the analysis, and if the NAP selection doesn't run, it automatically switches to the NB alternative, but if we don't name a danger, we get a non-runner.
Others must have a view on this, so I'll just go with the flow.
Thanks for the reply, and all the hard work
