Cheers mates
The name of the thread is somewhat misleading, coz the monetary side of it is more important than the number of winners, it's just a feasible way (?) of
getting the money.
Sure it looks cool to have 50-100-500-whatever unbroken string of winners, but hey, if an exchange offered you
to lay the 15-15 result (for example) in a footie match at some super-low odds (say 1.00001), then to repeat that 30 times would be no problems.
Compare that to hit 30 straight 1.60-winners! (just an example, you get it)
Now that's respect, in my book at least
NB: I am NOT having a go at people going for as many really-low-odds-winners as possible.
They put in the work and deserve as much respect as any other glory hunter!
